![how many us embassies flew the gay pride flag oann how many us embassies flew the gay pride flag oann](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KcJdIm68VHc/maxresdefault.jpg)
Still, Dakota Access was controversial enough from the start that its proposed route has been changed once already. Nor would it cut through ecologically fragile waterways in Minnesota, like the proposed Sandpiper Pipeline that Enbridge recently abandoned in the face of environmentalist opposition. Unlike Keystone XL, Dakota Access would not cross the Canadian border or connect with the internationally notorious tar sands. The stakes could hardly be higher.ĭakota Access, which would connect fracked oil fields in North Dakota’s Bakken region to an existing pipeline in Illinois, may once have seemed to oil companies like an easier-to-build alternative to other pipelines in the Midwest. government’s attitude toward climate change and indigenous rights. How it plays out will say much about the U.S.
![how many us embassies flew the gay pride flag oann how many us embassies flew the gay pride flag oann](http://www.cn-dn.com/upload/image/20160728/1469692207107688.jpg)
In the wake of Keystone XL’s rejection last November, Dakota Access has replaced Keystone XL as perhaps the most high-profile pipeline fight in the United States. She is one of thousands of people, including members of over 120 Native American tribes, who have converged at what is known as Oceti Sakowin, a protest camp in the path of the Dakota Access Pipeline just outside the Standing Rock Reservation.įor many climate activists the mass protests against Dakota Access, which is partly owned by oil infrastructure giant Enbridge Energy Partners, immediately bring to mind earlier nationwide efforts to oppose the Keystone XL tar sands project.
![how many us embassies flew the gay pride flag oann how many us embassies flew the gay pride flag oann](https://imageio.forbes.com/blogs-images/dawnstaceyennis/files/2019/06/PopularInfo.jpeg)
Mazakahomni is an enrolled member of the Spirit Lake Nation, with descendants from the Standing Rock Tribe. “I joined in taking a vow at a Moccasins on the Ground camp in South Dakota that if our leaders needed us, we would be there.” “It was a no brainer,” Mazakahomni said of her decision to drive from her home in Sioux City, Iowa to the Standing Rock Reservation, where protests partially stopped construction of Dakota Access beginning in August. This summer, when direct action against the Dakota Access Pipeline began, she knew the moment had arrived. While it remains to be seen whether the Army Corps of Engineers will ultimately allow construction to continue, Friday’s news marks an important milestone for a movement years in the making.įour years ago, Elrae Mazakahomni made a commitment to come to traditional Sioux territory in the Dakotas and help stop the oil industry’s “black snake,” when and if local leaders put out a call for help. The decision came after a long court battle and a wave of nonviolent direct actions led by indigenous organizations. On Friday, federal agencies halted work on the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline project where it cuts close to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota. FJB.By Nick Engelfried Embed from Getty Images or VERY consistent depending upon whether one considers the LGBT stuff to be beautiful, normal and positive OR destructive and harmful for whichever society normalizes it.Īaaaaaaand. In any case, it would seem that Trump was either being inconsistent with his policies. Again, is promoting the LGBT lifestyle among those countries an attempt to “modernize” them and help them become more liberal or is a “gift” like that more like a Trojan Horse meant to weaken and destroy the societal building blocks & family structure of a target country? In that case Trump seemed to be weaponizing and PROMOTING the LGBT lifestyle against enemy countries - perhaps as a way to weaken their respective cultures / societies?Īlso, if you recall, the stimulus bill also included millions of dollars for “Gender Studies” programs in Pakistan and who knows where else. It’s important to note that at the same time Trump (along with Ilhan, Talib, AOC, et al) simultaneously levied sanctions against foreign countries which have cultures and laws which prohibit homosexuality. Were those merely symbolic actions meant to pander to his “conservative, religious” base OR did he actually recognize something destructive about promoting and normalizing that lifestyle? Was he actually trying to maintain and protect the effectiveness of the US military? And if it’s bad for the military, wouldn’t that also apply to the larger society too? Trump banned Trans people from the US military, prohibited lighting up the White House with LGBT colors and prohibited flying the LGBT flag at US Embassies.